28 August 2008

Kind of back?//Summer update

Back with a new header!

Okay, so at least 2/5 of Letto will be back following the 2-month long hiatus.  I’ve spent the summer writing for Racewire.org, through my internship at the Applied Research Center/Colorlines Magazine, a race-oriented public policy and research organization based in NYC and Oakland.  I’ll append with some of my favorite posts of the summer (incl. some of my own!).  Now that I’m headed back to Hampshire for my last year, my posts will appear on a weekly- or bi-weekly basis.  Be sure to stay up on those, and sign up for ARC’s Facing Race Conference this November in CA…

And the rest of Letto are free-floating – Emerson’s working on fundraising/a documentary for the Jersey 7, Ana’s kicking it legal with a birthday, Ci’s getting to know Dyker Heights Brooklyn and Aryenish’s last piece has galvanized mad discussion on Facebook.

But we’re here, and new stuff will keep on coming.

Anti-Immigrant Nativists Need Spelling Lessons

The Green Economy is Coming!

The Irony of Gary Glitter

Now you knows things are bad – Activism and Time Out NY

3 July 2008

Choosing Transness: A coming out story of sorts, and more…

hi ya’ll,

i wrote the below note after being totally inspired by a performance that i just went to. i’m sending this note to out because i love you (the readers) and it means a lot to me to have as many eyes on this as possible. it’s a work in progress and i will truly cherish any feedback.

i wrote the below piece in an anarcho-stream of conscious style so if you get lost, just go with it, i tried to tie everything up in the end. i’m trying a new style and hope it works in this context. it’s also kinda long and pretty unpolished (i only wrote this late last week and have re-visited it twice since), but i would sincerely, genuinely like your input.

this is kind of a coming out for me and my heart is pounding as i send it. hopefully you’ll see why by the end. i’ve been working through these issues for a long, long time but have never felt comfortable talking about them so here they are in written form (scary).

also, a lot of the questions i ask are not rhetorical, but actual questions. so take notes (if you need to), and let me know if what i’ve written is fucked up or not. thanks. and i love you.

*aryenish

Choosing Transness: A coming out story of sorts, and more…

So I consider myself, as of recent, a pretty confident person. People, for a good portion of my life, have told me that I’m outspoken and am able to advocate various needs. I think a lot of that has to do with the fact that from a very early age my parents pushed me, and in that process I found within myself a strong desire to change the world and you have to have a certain kind of strength if you embark on that totally liberation kind of struggle…but I’m digressing and this is only the 3rd sentence.

I’ve been an activist of sorts for about 10 years now, which is a weird thing to admit because saying that I’ve been something for 10 years means almost half my life. Most of my activism has dealt with nearly unfathomable forms of torture and oppression: I’ve worked primarily in the animal rights movement. Yes, it’s a new movement and “controversy” surrounds it due to its very newness in the even radical social consciousness, yet I continue to see living beings continually commodified, consumed, and exploited in this society. I could write a book about this.. oh wait, I already wrote a thesis on this, so let me move on to why you are probably reading this. Transness.

First off let me explain my use of language. What is transness as opposed to being trans? I used the word transness as a very specific variation taken from the word queer. I love the word queer and everything that it symbolizes in its reappropriation (namely: the lack of rules and the fluidity of sexuality and gender).

Just like being queer, we can embrace queerness, so too do I embrace transness. I take language very seriously and believe that at the base level, language reflects our politics, our ideology, and serves as an indicator of how committed we are to our goals. Language is more than a mode of communication; it can be used as a medium for power—an institution of abuse, and in a positive way—an indicator of liberation. Ideological changes must include language, which is why the use of pronouns is so important to individual’s lives (but I’ll get into that later).

If language is a form of activity, then it must be understood to analyze the cultural and social functions of language is also to analyze power, but I’m getting to heavy here. I just wanted to give a brief note on the word “transness” and also to satisfy the need I have to explain the language you’ll see in the coming pages. For the sake of this piece I use the words “nonhuman animal” and “human animal” instead of “animal” and “human.” My goal with this is to be intentional about expanding the way human animals view the word “animal.” Common’ you can’t expect an animal rights activist to let something like that slide. I mean, all oppression are interconnected, so it makes sense for me to stay true to my values and put that note in, right? (If you want more on the interconnections of oppression, or the uses of language ask me about my thesis.. we’ll talk for hours).

So, why transness? And where is the connection to nonhuman animal rights? Well, there isn’t really one other than the connection that is located in my body. Most of my life has revolved around a politic that has resided outside of my identity. It has only been in the past 3-4 years that I have located and understood that my body hosts tremendous strength (remember the first sentence of this piece? I wasn’t born confidant if you catch my drift). I have worked tirelessly in the past few years on trying to find out who I am and in that process fell deeply in love with myself (and am still falling in love with myself), but I’ll leave the gushing for my journal. What I’m trying to get at is that I slowly learned about oppressions outside the singular oppression I knew and fought against: nonhuman animal oppression. And once I learned how things like capitalism, colonialism, orientalism, imperialism, racism, classism, ageism, looksism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, speciesism (amongst the rest) really operate I began to find myself in them. That’s one thing 2nd wave feminism brought us was the logo “the personal is political;” and that’s the truth.

I began to insert myself in this complicated history that is the human animal experience and found that I am a person of color (where I was raised being told I was white.. long story), that I am a ciswoman (and what that really means to me in the moments I chose to think about it), that I am queer (and want to embrace that love for other individuals to all its worth), and that I am product of globalization and born to two immigrants who named this land of the “united states” home eleven months before I was born. I learned that I have absolutely no representation in any forms of media being a queer south asian zirmen who has a complicated gender identity as well many layers of cultural differences that I can’t begin to get into right now. But the personal is political so let’s return to that.

I was always drawn to the struggle faced by “the trans movement” and quickly learned as much as I could about being an ally and fighting the sex = gender debacle as well as the good fight against the gender binary. I wanted to fuck gender. And not in the kinky way.

So there I was. It was my 3rd year in college and I was feeling good. I finally figured out what in the hell I was doing in school, building confidence in myself (again that first sentence… it’s a work in progress), and learning that being an activist doesn’t mean never having fun. In all of this I quickly found that my ability to find a good portion of the population androgynous or gender ambiguous was a pretty rare feat and slowly I began to use the gaze the rest of the world uses to view individuals. I never had any desire to understand “what people are” in the gender context, probably because I get that very question almost daily in regards to my skin color and racial appearance.

In my youth, I don’t remember my parents ever telling me concretely that vagina is directly related and proportional to “woman” / she / pink / Barbie’s / “girly things” etc, and I thank them for that. Although, unfortunately, through virtue of being a product of this society I got plenty of that socialization everywhere else.

And so I learned through talking to friends in New York City and Western Massachusetts that I had a hard time seeing gender, and I don’t mean in that “colorblind” bullshit sort of way, but that I really just never found feminine or masculine features in anyone and was almost always pretty confused about / found irrelevant what sex an individual was, let alone their gender. So there I was on the streets of New York City and Western Massachusetts and I was trying to teach myself to see gender.

That’s right folks, you read me correctly, I was trying to teach myself gender (at age 19) so that I could break it down. It felt like an odd task even for me (and still I’m not sure how good it was for me to do), but I did it, and I am still kind of doing it, and in the process I taught myself to think about gender constantly.

And so there I was (about to be a senior year at Hampshire College) at this prestigious internship at a “women’s” foundation in New York City, (the foundation had just decided to include trans folks in their circuit of fund giving and were doing a lot of work around those issues) and I was feeling pretty stupid and out of place. I considered it a safe space to ask a few questions so I asked one of the staff members “why the “t” was in LGBT?” I mean, really, why is it that when we talk about LGBT we are taking about sexuality and gender at the time, and mostly we aren’t talking about gender at all. Yes, the vast majorities of people who are trans also identify in queer in some way, but why make that a rule? And why more often than not do the organizations that “do LGBT work” aren’t queer. There’s a difference between being “gay” and “queer.”

Well, the staff member didn’t really have an answer. He acknowledged that it was a good point made by a naïve, “new” queer. I didn’t really feel satisfied with his answer and so I have been on a rampant search for the answer to this question for the many years since this day, and have yet to come across a sufficient answer or even something close. I guess the mainstream “gay” movement just likes the sound of “LGBT” as opposed to “LGB.” I mean, if there was more of an effort to address the issues around transness in the gay movement wouldn’t we have at least one trans signified monument in Christopher Park? …The park that commemorates the gay hero’s of Stonewall, because if anyone knows their history there were trans sisters (and I’m sure brothers) in that very joint, on that very night in late June in 1969.

I guess I should just come out with what I’m trying to say in this piece instead of surrounding it with everything else, but the lead up is important… I mean isn’t that why there’s “foreplay”?

I guess this rant got started by an incredible, life-changing, performance I attended that tackled some of the issues the queer, genderqueer, and trans communities face as in conjunction with oppression, polyamory, etc, etc. From it I got a really creative look into myself and into the trans movement and where I fit in it. And I’m still not sure where that is, but I want to be clear that in my own way I want to be an ally because at the end of the day I can pass as a (sometimes) straight woman of fair complexion, and while there are certainly disadvantages to this position in the social hierarchy of power, I am in a much more privileged position than say my freaky looking friend (of color?). I just need to acknowledge that before I go much further.

And so it is. The moment of choosing. In working backwards from the title and exploring transness first I feel I must make a deliberate attempt to now elaborate the more difficult part of the thoughts swimming in my brain around choosing.

I guess I should begin somewhere in the middle because there is no staring point, or continuum, or binary, or hierarchy or anything of the sort for this story. It’s all a jumbled mess and I like it that way. Side note: I don’t understand how or when “we” radical folk, artists, and the such – try as we might to deconstruct this capitalist, misogynist, fear mongering society – ended up using the same tools and thought patterns that came before us. Isn’t it time to think of things as coexisting simultaneously in myriad wavelengths, across time frequencies, and in all of our hearts simultaneously? I’m ready to get creative toward this “revolution” for “liberation” that we constantly all talk about.

So ya, back to choosing, I guess I’ll start somewhere else since the above tangent is forcing me to have two starting points for this portion of my “essay.” I was reading this book a few months back called That’s Revolting: Queer Strategies for Resisting Assimilation, good essays, good writers, good book. One of the essays stood out as having a significant impact on me: Choice Cuts, by Charlie Anders. It was about choosing queerness. I haven’t read it in a while, but what I took away from it was this: do “we” (whoever you want that to be) devalue the person who chooses queerness? If an individual chooses to fornicate with someone of their same sex or gender how is that any less radical than someone who’s had those same urges since they were seven? I took this essay to directly (although not in language) address the issues of authenticity (a word my friends who study and do anti-racists work are familiar with). Is it necessary to transition from one state to another for us to be authentically queer or trans? Who really is authentically queer? And who the fuck decides?!

Is there some kind of hierarchy of queerness and transness imposed by queer and trans folk? Then what kinds of power are held when interacting with other folks who haven’t felt “those urges” since they were in the womb? And isn’t this just getting into the whole nature / nurture / free-will debate?

If we choose to be queer, trans, non-mainstream, non-conforming, or any variation of these then is it our fault for not getting a job, loosing our housing, or even for feeling safe and comfortable participating in the mainstream “gay movement?” If our perversity and freakhood is a choice and we are screwing the mainstream up the butt then are we proving that we aren’t hardwired for it? We’re saying, “Ya, I had a choice. I’m a freak, I like wearing my full beard with my lavender halter dress and a pair of men’s sandals and it doesn’t matter if I got a penis or a vagina. I’m proud of how I look, ‘cause damnit I look good. I’m doing it because I want to, and that’s good enough.”

In this bogus quest gays have undertaken to claim that, “we are just like you.” No one is begging the question who this “we” is, and who this “you” is. It is the classic case of us internalized othering, of recognizing the “us / them” mentality created by the patriarchal, homophobobic, straight society (I’ll refer you to my thesis if you want more on othering). But really, when the fuck did all the queers in the world become a “we,” and when did we all want marriage rights?

So now when we come back to the issue of “gay pride” doesn’t it seem weird that the underlying mentality has been “we didn’t choose this… if we did we’d be straight” / “we’re just like you.” If we want to be just like straights then where is the celebration and pride in difference? Saying I choose this automatically puts a value judgment on queerness and transness and that’s scary to the straight, mainstream culture because that means that they can be queer too. (Oh, the horror!)

And so there I was first row in the audience and the performer held up a sign to symbolize their own gender identity as “they” and “he.” And not that that was particularly mind-blowing unto it self, but it called into my mind why I can’t do that. Why has it been that for the past three years I have wanted use ALL pronouns but have never once felt comfortable to ask folks to call me by that (and I’m talking about in radical, queer circles). I know why, it’s because for the most part I’m a pretty femmey person. I have never once identified with the word “femme,” but queers all around me seem to label me as such. Even when I’m wearing my “butch” clothes I guess my long hair just does it, and thus I am cast as “femme.”

And so there we are, all of us sitting in a circle introducing ourselves at the first meeting for “X” organization, and answering the classic icebreaker question, and since all of use seem to dress in conjunction with our given sex goes no one asks for “name, icebreaker, and pronoun” we all just go off of cultural assumptions and answer “name and icebreaker.” But the saddest part is that I’m not even sure I would feel comfortable saying that I want to use all pronouns (which is totally weird for me… again, remember my second sentence, where’s that ability to advocate for myself with the gender stuff, right?) because at this point I’m just getting used to the idea of asking people to use all pronouns as I type this very essay. And I want to acknowledge that gender is about more than pronouns but for now that seems like an easy place to start. So I wonder why we can’t choose transness just like we can’t choose queerness.

Why is my desire to fuck with gender seen as less serious because I haven’t been dealing with this on a visceral level for the past ten years? I want to be very clear that I don’t want to devalue or discount the work my fellow genderqueer / queer / trans friends who are working on these issues, but I don’t understand why in this society only the people who have been struggling with gender since childhood are the ones who are fighting this battle in adulthood; and further, why is my struggle of the past three years deemed less worthy?
Why do I feel like I’m being problematic if I want to wear my favorite cream linen dress and want to be addressed in male pronouns? Because I do, so I guess I’ll just come out and say it.. I want people to start using all pronouns with me (please).

Is it problematic for me to want to wear a binder three days in a row and then not for another month? I’m really not sure. I would love for people to call me out if what I’m saying is bullshit, but I’ve struggled with this for a long time and have not really felt like I could create the space to discuss this because my (socially created) gender presentation matches my sex (for the most part). Am I being fucked up here? If so, I’ll own it.

I think it’s time we really start asking more challenging questions. Why are we leaving the fight to confront the problematics of the gender complex only to those individuals who have struggled with it and who find themselves in stark opposition to the gender roles they were assigned based on their genitalia at birth. Isn’t gender about all of us? My biggest fear is alienating trans folks who have had to deal with systematic and institutionalized oppression for being who they are, by asking these questions, but I need to ask them. It’s part of my process.

My aim here is to add a complexity to the gender issue, to find a point of inclusion so that we have a point to break this system down. Can I, a ciswoman, use male or gender-neutral pronouns sometimes (and not only when it’s convenient) and all the while present in my glorious, busty, feminine attire? Isn’t that what the word queer is about… the fluidity of sexuality and gender? Isn’t it time we fuck up the gender institution? And can the desires I just wrote about aid this endeavor? Please say it’s so. And if it’s not, then please tell me why.

Thanks for reading. aryenish. [ abirdie (at) sunflower.com ]

9 June 2008

NYPD, Sean Bell, UCLA – A Taser Round-Up

taser

So it is officially summer. Even though I’m still in Massachusetts spending some extra time at my work-study job at Hampshire College, my heart and mind is in New York City, where I’ll finally move into my new apartment in the neighborhood of Sunset Park (where I grew up, where I will live/work this summer, and hopefully, where I will spend the rest of my life). For New Yorkers, summer usually means block parties and bbqs and free concerts in the park. For others, it will also mean direct actions, marches, etc., etc. Out and about, indeed: What better time to examine the newest tool buzzing around weapons-covetee circles?

(In jest) Yes girls, $450 will buy you this metallic pink taser etched with Harry Potter-esque lightning bolt to give you true superhero/wizardry action! Move over, diamond-encrusted pepper spray! Hooray for the commodification and outright essentialism of womyn empowerment/female-bodied safety concerns. Obviously, if we will continue to make female bodies feel vulnerable in society, we should also use that fear to fuel the sagging economy. Take this quote here for the Crosman Pink Air Rifle which can be had for a mere $40:

Pink guns are the hottest trend. They’re the surest way to get girls interested in the shooting sports. Get one for the girl in your family, and you’ll be surprised how much she loves shooting!

That’s not all. Let us take a moment to appreciate the savvy of this treasure’s designers/manufacturers, who have caught the pulse of this edgy trend. Via AP Wire/Gothamist: this summer, 3500 NYPD officers (in addition to the handful of Emergency Services Unit officials) will start carrying tasers in the interest of diminishing the use of deadly force. Oh okay, so that’s why the DA acquitted the three officers in the Sean Bell case, of all charges? If the officers had been armed with tasers, then the use of deadly force in that case would have been negligible at best? What’s the danger of racial profiling, police brutality, and judicial neglect of the former two, when officers are using stun guns that don’t aim to kill?

Of course, this also means that officers can feel free to tase unruly individuals in any context! Witness the stunning of Iranian-American UCLA student Mostafa Tabatabainejad way back in 2006, who was tased while being escorted out of the Powell Library for not having a student ID card. The incident was recorded via cameraphone and watched by stunned thousands on YouTube. Florida, as well, has its own taser martyr, UofF student Andrew Meyer, detained last September for acting rough during a John Kerry appearance (later popularizing the phrase, “Don’t tase me, bro! Owwww…”).

According to Wikipedia, tasers have a long history with urban police task forces, predicated on the assumption that they decrease the number of deaths in officer-involved shootings. The evidence stands inconclusive. However, in January 2007, the Houston Chronicle released a special report assessing police violence since taser deployment, stating:

Since the Houston Police Department armed itself with Tasers [...] officers have shot, wounded and killed as many people as before the widespread use of the stun guns, a Houston Chronicle analysis shows.

Officers have used their Tasers more than 1,000 times in the past two years, but in 95 percent of those cases they were not used to defuse situations in which suspects wielded weapons and deadly force clearly would have been justified.

Instead, more than half of the Taser incidents escalated from relatively common police calls, such as traffic stops, disturbance and nuisance complaints, and reports of suspicious people.

In more than 350 cases, no crime was committed. No person was charged or the case was dropped by prosecutors or dismissed by judges and juries, according to the Houston Chronicle’s analysis of the first 900 police Taser incidents, which occurred between December 2004 and August 2006.

Of those people who were charged with crimes, most were accused of misdemeanors or nonviolent felonies.

So in Houston’s case, officers stunned more than they had previously shot, and kept shooting anyway. What will that look like for New York? Seeing as how one can’t even have a peaceful NY Phillipine Day Parade, the future is bleak.

The Wiki article has another trivia gem: TASER stands for “Thomas A. Swift’s Electric Rifle,” immortalizing a turn-of-the-century adventure novel’s hero, who apparently used the weapon to hunt for ivory in Africa, only to have to rescue his white friends from a group of native Africans.

Stun guns to stop the deaths resulting from the sustained and brutal policing of bodies of color. Racist legacy to sustain another racist legacy, indeed.

1 June 2008

lambdaistanbul shut down!

a local turkish court made its final decision on May 29, 2008 that lambdaistanbul, an important lgbtt solidarity association that has been active in turkey as an organization since 1993, and had become a registered association in 2006, was a threat to the “morals”/”family values” of Turkish society. the decision has been made for lambdaistanbul to close its doors on the 6th hearing. the closing case was initially filed against lambdaistanbul by the governorship of istanbul which claimed that the organization was violating the law and public morality. (this is the same governorship responsible for gentrifying its own residents out of their neighborhoods, but i will write more on that later.) there has also been controversy around the association’s name, which is claimed unfit by some parties on the basis that it is not in turkish.

for an official and detailed explanation of the progression and result of the case, you can read the english language version of lambdaistanbul’s press release and call for solidarity here.

lambdaistanbul is the first and largest lgbtt solidarity association in istanbul. it works closely with kaos gl (in the city of ankara) and sappho’nun kizlari (organized around lesbian identity.) it is also linked to and supported by turkish-german glbtt groups in germany such as türk gay and gladt (gays&lesbians aus der turkei.) lambdaistanbul has been supporting the bi-monthly gay and lesbian magazine kaos gl, which has been published since September 1994. lambdaistanbul organizes and co-organizes local and national meetings, as well as fundraiser parties and other events for the lgbtt community and allies. they have a telephone support line and legal services geared towards glbtt persons who seek justice in a world of police brutality and state terror as well as social homophobia and transphobia. if you are looking for a background in lgbtt struggles and activism in turkey that is available in english, kaos gl has a superb online archive of reports and history files covering the period from 1970s to the present.

lambdaistanbul’s website reassures us that the office/headquarters/cultural center will not be closed, and all meetings and events will take place as planned(hopefully including upcoming annual pride week in june 2008). they are still waiting on the appeal which has been made to take the case to a higher court, which makes the decision of the local court ineffective for the time being. in the meantime, they have also been receiving some unexpected visits to the center from the police. human rights watch has already had their eyes on the case of lambdaistanbul for a while now. hrw’s january 2008 report on turkey mentions the case amongst the many other internationally recognized human rights violations that my beloved country continues to practice – including ethnic/cultural discrimination, bans and limits on freedom of expression and assembly, police brutality and torture, etc. you can read hrw’s recently published (may 21) report on “gender, sexuality, and human rights in a changing turkey” here. (click here for pdf version.)

lambdaistanbul has organized a press conference to be held on tuesday, june 3rd with the participation of important figures from both turkey and abroad. the participants include: Ufuk Uras (MP, independent), Sebahat Tuncel (MP, DTP)
Pınar Selek (amargi and women’s platform for the reform of the turkish penal code), Ville Forsman (amnesty international), Emma Sinclair-Webb (human rights watch) and Sedef Çakmak (lambdaistanbul.) the organization is also planning a protest march on saturday, june 7th, for which they called upon the national and international communities of activists.

please look out for more updates in the coming days and weeks…

closure case in the news:

bbc news coverage on friday, may 30:

Turkish gay group will fight ban

turkish daily news coverage on friday, may 30:

Court decides to shut down Istanbul’s gay rights association

bianet coverage on monday, april 21:

Judge postpones; experts defy gay association closure case

pinknews (uk) on friday, may 30:

Council of Europe expresses concern over gay rights in Turkey

human rights watch on monday, june 02:

Turkey: Court Shows Bias, Dissolves Lambda Istanbul

additional links:

lambdaistanbul’s listing on the queer resources directory

lambdaistanbul facebook group (in turkish)

kaos gl news in english

istanbul pride 2007 on youtube

30 May 2008

cihan has an existential crisis at 3 am and decides to start writing her 1st post.

so joyce has been giving me (and the rest of us) ‘friendly’ reminders to post on our blog, most of which made me feel pressed to write but also guilty that i haven’t been writing, especially now that my division III (senior thesis) is done for about a month or so. she even sent us this windows live writer thing, among other gadgets/plug-ins, or whatever they’re called, so we could easily post on the blog. it’s not that i don’t want to post, but it’s such a personal and vulnerable experience to share what you write, even if you write crap, and i could not bring myself to do it. it’s kind of like showing your underwear to the world. but here i am, sitting on katie’s desk at her home in chicago, while joyce and katie sleep on the bed adorably; they’re lying over the covers horizontally, their feet sticking out of the corner, fully clothed in their day wear, facing each other. and i’m like, what the hell, maybe it’s about time for me to be done with this single life that i have been leading for almost a year now, after a series of train wreck relationships that left me more of a cynic than ever. i’m really not done being single, however, this so effin cute. (mash’allah.)

i also figured that spending some time writing my 1st post to the blog would be a good way to escape from this resume-fixing, cover-letter-writing, job-searching routine that i’m slowly starting to get caught up in. i’m hoping this does not go on for too long until i have a paying job and one that will convince U.S. Homeland Security that I am working in my field, preferably (but most likely not), two in one, while i still wait for my OPT (optional practical training) permit to legally secure my stay in the U.S. for another year.

my friend hira called from skype and i had to stop writing, since this is a call which i could not ignore. hira transferred to hampshire college from lahore university of management sciences (lums), and is now concentrating on film/video and postcolonial studies amongst many other things that she is interested in. besides having become sisters for life and pulling many all-nighters together in each other’s rooms, youtubing turkish and pakistani tunes, our relationship developed through a common interest in the intricacies of gender and nationalism in non-western, (especially muslim) countries. hira went back home to lahore, pakistan for the summer to work on some video projects that have been developing in her mind while she was spending her first year at hampshire. in fear of waking up joyce and katie, i took the computer to the bathroom where i seated myself on the floor, while hira stepped outside to a hallway in lums where she was using the library to do some research, besides meeting some old friends and professors whom she had been missing. a few seconds later hira was spilling her “returning home from the 1st year of american college experience” to me, all in one breath. as soon as she opened her mouth she started talking about gender, and i asked her to type what she was saying so i could remember her exact words . (the next morning, joyce informed the that i could have recorded the skype conversation.) here’s what she had to say:

“everybody’s like, ‘girl stay in your place’, and i refuse to stay in my place. nobody understands…. except for (my friend) f. her world was also american-uni-transformed, when she went away for a semester, and then she came back and is all coolass environmental activist =) i’m SO proud of her.”

as joyce reflected upon in a previous entry, the idea of travel is complicated for most of us, even those of us who crossed the ocean to receive a liberal arts education in the far West. hira’s snippets of gender politics from home and her respective reverse-culture shock reminded me of similar/parallel experiences i have had at my own home in istanbul, turkey, whenever i went back for the past four years that i have been in school in the U.S. it is hard not to idealize home from here; sitting in college dorm rooms and libraries, american friends’ houses, small town cafes, big city trains – the stuff that we dreamed of until the day we got here. only then home becomes this far-away place to which we don’t belong to anymore, which we cannot go back to without being an outsider on the inside (or insider on the outside?) as we walk forward from these experiences of “being” (away, outside, inside, back, etc.) we carry with us the unique perspectives that we have gained, through longing for, missing, looking for homes to which we can belong to again. we like to think we are intellectual exiles from where we are (because our minds are back home), and from home (because our perspectives of “the world” have been shaped here.) it is not that romantic, however. our idealized notions of home break down once we read of a military coup in the news, or another political crisis, or yet another national economic crisis to come in the next year. “disasters” back home remind us that we are not there to share the pain, to go out to the streets and protest, to wait outside courtrooms asking for justice. (please look out for my next post on the case of the closing of lambdaistanbul, an important LGBTT organization in turkey.) then the guilt sinks in, and you don’t sleep until you get a hold of mom, or anyone who could tell you firsthand about the situation at home.

“don’t be stupid, don’t try to come back. stay in the west. why would you want to come back home? there is nothing for you here.

you belong to a different world now.”

23 April 2008

In Memory of Dith Pran

image 

(Photo from MSNBC)

Time watches slowly…

Almost thirty years after the violence, Khmer Rouge leaders who perpetrated the genocide in Cambodia are quietly being brought to trial. The first formal hearing was held last November, and proceedings will start soon.

About three weeks ago, Cambodian refugee and New York Times photo-journalist Dith Pran passed away after a long battle with pancreatic cancer. Pran’s story was documented in the Academy Award-winning film The Killing Fields, which centers around his relationship with NYT columnist and friend Sydney Shanberg.

Last year, one of our friends was working on a community mural at our Cultural Center as part of her Division III project, and requested a photo of Pran. He sent us an old one, and it was kind of cool to hold a token from a namesake of the space you’re sitting in .

Three months ago, I read this article from the NYTimes about how gentrification has been pushing the Cambodian refugee/Cambodian American community out of the Fordham Road neighborhood in the Bronx. The article also cites a lack of neighborhood services and community as reasons for the community’s disintegration.

Last week was Cambodian New Year.

Tonight, we held a vigil for Pran in the Cultural Center, a safe space at Hampshire for students of color and international students.

21 April 2008

Meditation on Travel

This semester, I’m taking a class at Smith College entitled “Asian American Autobiography: Abroad,” taught by Floyd Chung, resident SC APA hero. The class is a seminar, and for the first time in my college career, I’m in a class with majority Asian/Pacific/American women. I loved how the course de-centered whiteness: whenever I’ve learned about the politics of travel/tourism, it has always been from a white perspective.

The idea of travel doesn’t always sit well with most folx I know, myself included. Maybe that has a lot to do with my age (what twenty-something can attest to stability of space?), but I think I can say that notions of home and place are very complicated for me, and those around me. Hybrid identities and diaspora inform these confusions; so do the politics of policing and nation-states. At an age when so many people travel, whether as study-abroad in South America or backpacking in Europe or (shudder) teaching English in Asia, where is the accountability and critical analysis?

This issue has already been beaten to death in close friendship circles, especially at Hampshire: our Cuba program gets talked about all the time, and every semester, white Americans return from the island with tales and cheap smuggled cigarettes. But sometimes, travel is informed by an already-existent history of struggle (rather than trying to insert oneself into a place and its history and politics). I guess often the best thing to do is to lay out that history, and our privileges, upon the table – to be vigilant and transparent about that negotiation process.

What does that look like in real life? If home (for me: gentrification, diaspora, rent as 90% of income, queerness not welcome) has already been so complicated/non-romantic, how do I begin to break down my travel experiences?

20 April 2008

Dazed+Confused News Round-Up Pt. I

Untitled

Since the semester is drawing to a close, and I am spending my days and nights hiding in places to do work, my only real connection to the world, campus or actual, has been news. What a privilege, huh?: to be locked up in a room, writing about global migrations and institutional transparency, only to look up, dazed, to a leafy campus that only discusses current events in hushed whispers.

Last night, I sat with Katie and Brecklyn in the Writing Center, trying to do work even though I’ve been coughing up blood the past few days (bronchitis? who knows?). Katie stirred, and I looked over. “Have you seen the front page of the Times?” She showed me her computer screen. “Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand,” spliced with a Brady Bunch-like panel of nine headshots, all older white men captioned with military titles.

We read the eleven(!)-page feature with zest. “This is the Watergate of our times!” I told Cihan in a GChat message. Katie was panting comedically, dialing everyone she knew on her cell phone. “This changes everything.”

Two hours later, we checked CNN, ABC, Al Jazeera, all the major news outlets, waiting for some trace of the big story that had broke. Nothing. We turned the television on, checked all the tickers on the news channels; nothing. We Googled, we blog-tracked. The story wasn’t being picked up anywhere. “Is this a freeze?” I asked Katie.

Barstow’s piece implicates top Pentagon officials, the White House, and various media outlets. The Times had sued the Defense Department for access to an 8,000-page document of transcripts and emails that trace “a Pentagon talking-points operation” to before the Congressional declaration of war in 2003. It seems, the Pentagon used the cultural validity of retired war heroes to sway the American public, under the guise of independent commentary.

As well, many former analysts also admitted the direct relationship between their business interests (several run consulting firms with military contracts, others advertised their exclusive government access to investors) and the kinds of stories they told on-air. In some cases, Barstow reports, analysts were used by the Pentagon to scoop news outlets; essentially, they were spies.

What is going on? Where is the cleaning of house? The Saturday Night Massacre? The resurgence of interest in investigative reporting? (That one is Katie’s rallying cry.) I spent my Thursday night reading Nick Lemann’s Amateur Hour, a piece that appeared almost two years ago in the New Yorker, contemplating the quality of blogosphere reportage versus traditional journalism. The latter, according to many opinions I’ve heard, has suffered from lack of public interest, and continues to be pummeled at the hands of untrained pundits (myself among them, I suppose, though I don’t pretend that anyone reads this blog) armed with a domain name and some web skillz.

This is not finished. But Mr. Woodward, Mr. Hersh, Mr. Bartlett… if you are listening, where are you?

19 April 2008

censorship//inaugural 1st real post

Welcome to the first Letto post! It’s taken me a while to get my act together, but as you can see, we’re ready to roll. Cihan and I have been sifting over the logistics since late December, a hard task over winter break, since WordPress was banned in Turkey. Basically, we would send screenshots back and forth until we agreed about anything. Luckily, her opinion matters much.

It seems that the ban opened many Western eyes to the slowly-emerging firewall project in Turkey, who has joined China, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria and others. In China’s case, the high-profile Golden Shield Project (ironically dubbed The Great Firewall of China) made waves with Google, when the internet giant agreed to comply with Beijing’s censorship regulations. Interestingly enough, earlier in the year, Turkish access to YouTube was suspended (when videos were uploaded criticizing Ataturk, the so-called “father of modern Turkey”), and then lifted after a widespread outcry.

The current ban was instigated through a religious/defamation conflict via Adnan Oktar and his lawyers. Help-Pakistan writes:

the new Turkish Pro-Islamic Government has now decided to clamp down on all blogs hosted on WordPress.com, and also on Blogcu.com, since one specific site adnanoktar.wordpress.com had hurled insulting remarks against Adnan Oktar, a leading Muslim advocate of creationism, who is an active leader in the creation vs. evolution debate, subscribing to the Old Earth Creationism concept…

Seven months later, the ban continues. Mideast Youth has started a petition urging to lift the ban, and The Great Firewall of Turkey has instructions for how to access WordPress via Wordprexy. Amit Agarwal over at Digital Inspiration has also compiled other ways to bypass government censorship initiatives.

We at Letto stand in solidarity with these communities, and the continued struggle for freedom of expression under state power.

– Joyce

blockpng.png

2 April 2008

Hampshire Students Walk Out

Here’s some the press that we got yesterday for the walkout.  We somehow made it onto the AP Wire, which was huge.  From MassLive:

Students at Hampshire College staged a walkout Monday to protest what they say is the administration’s inaction on issues of institutional racism and campus diversity.

After the walkout and a series of meetings with students, the private liberal arts college’s president issued a statement pledging to address issues including funding for student groups and training for faculty, staff and students.

Someone always manages to say it better than you, something that I concede (haha) in the moment.  I feel a little bit in the thick of it.  Queer Kid of Color, however, a fellow WordPress user, has some excellent and heartfelt coverage of the walkout, as well as some great pictures.  When the clock struck 11AM, over 350 students converged on the Library Lawn – keep in mind that Hampshire’s student population hovers around 1300, so more than 25% of the campus participated in the action.  People stayed for a long time, even though freezing snow was falling. 

2006 alum Seth Wessler has also written a post on Racewire (the Colorlines Magazine Blog) about the walkout, placing it in the context of the upcoming election, as well as the larger state of race relations in the United States.  He writes:

Change will not come without the many dedicated efforts of people working, organizing, writing, agitating and advocating together toward these ends. Lets hope that this one institution’s administration makes the changes demanded of it and, in so doing, sets an example for the country. And let’s, the rest of us, follow these students.

Someone also mentioned that we  made it onto the Barack Obama campaign website, but I can’t seem to find it.  Anyone know where it is?

31 March 2008

4PM Negotiations Live NOW

Hi everyone,

So since Michelle Green and Aaron Berman (Dean of Student Services and Dean of Faculty, respectively) could not be present with us today, Mark Spiro, Vice President of Finance and Administration, member of the Cabinet, and member of CHOIR (the Committee at Hampshire on Investment Responsibility), has joined us in the Negotiation Room.

Present Today: Ralph Hexter, President; Nancy Kelley, Secretary of the College and Senior Adviser to the President; Jaime Davila, Special Presidential Assistant on Diversity and Multicultural Affairs; Diana Fernandez, Assistant to the President, and Student Negotiations Team: Joyce Li, Cyree Johnson, Cihan Tekay, Brecklyn Walters, Christian Baer, Hira Nabi, and Julian Padilla.

UPDATE : (4:15PM) We will be going through each of the demands, and voicing the general consensus on some of the issues we took (in the SOURCE all-community meeting that took place from 1:30PM to 4PM) on each one.  Administrators/staff present will be allowed to voice questions for clarification in response. 

UPDATE No. 2 : (5:16PM) We have finished voicing our concerns and objections to the presented “Administrative Action” items.  Ralph is now speaking: he is “prepared to see the complexities that you see, the nuances, and also the attention to detail and terminology; the administration as well sees complexities that I don’t get the sense that you always fully appreciate.”  He is “unsure of the next step.” 

Update No. 3 : (5:37PM) Jaime has now been asked to speak to some of the efforts, or the vision of next steps or progress.  He is stressing “his mantra,” of institutionalizing various things related to the demands, especially changing structures to allow for continuous change. 

*Personal Opinion Interjection: We are basically talking about nothing.

31 March 2008

Passwords on Demand Responses

Hi everyone,

For the record, a password has been put on most of the posts from the liveblogging this morning. This morning, SOURCe students at the Cultural Center responded to the demands, and we’d like to keep those responses as confidential as possible. The password has been given to members of SOURCe community; we’ll be posting an update/other materials from this morning’s negotiations very soon.

The Negotiations Committee will be resuming negotiations today, at 4PM 31 March 2008. In a meantime, here’s the official PRESS RELEASE from the walk-out, and the REVISED DEMANDS that were given to the administration last week.

31 March 2008

Protected: The President’s Words

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: UPDATE to last demand…

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: Closing on Days/Campus Wide TeachIn

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: Instit. Adv.

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: NSNS policy

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: CHOIR/investment

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: Admissions

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: ID-based mods/ResLife

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: WOC in Health Services

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: Library/Resources

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: Residential Halls

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: ADMIN HAVE LEFT ROOM FOR OUR DISCUSSION OF DEMANDS

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


31 March 2008

Protected: Part Time Coordinator for QCA

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: